Obverse

National arms above ribbon

Legend
LATVIJA
HUGUENIN

Designer Rihards Zariņš

Reverse

Value and date

Legend
2
Santimi
1922
R. ZARRIŅŠ

Edge

Type Plain

Issues

  • 1922
    Mintage

    Mint name below ribbon

    VF€4.50XF€8.90UNC€13
  • 1922

    Mintage included above · Without mint name below ribbon

    VF€11XF€22UNC€31
  • 1923 Huguenin
    Mintage

    Hug. 2.5 g; pattern with deeper relief; Huguenin Frères

    UNC€1,800
  • 1926
    Mintage

    Birmingham Mint (Heaton & Sons)

    VF€2XF€2.80AU€4.60UNC€4.60
  • 1928
    Mintage

    Birmingham Mint (Heaton & Sons)

    VF€2XF€2.50AU€3.60UNC€24
  • 1932
    Mintage

    Royal Mint

    VF€2XF€2.20AU€3.50UNC€32
  • 1932Proof

    Royal Mint

Catalogue numbers

KM#
2
Schön#
2

Physical

Metal
Bronze95% Copper, 4% Tin, 1% Zinc
Weight
2 g
Diameter
19.5 mm
Thickness
0.93 mm
Shape
Round
Alignment
Medal (0°)
Technique
Milled

Details

Value
2 Santīmi
= 1/50 Lats
Type
Circulation
Demonetized
25 March 1941

Notes

In his extensive study of the 1, 2, and 5 santimi coins of the first Latvian Republic, Mihails Božko uncovered many historical facts. Some results of his efforts are summarized below. More details can be found in his articles (in Russian) and in this explanatory video (in Russian). Mints This coin type was produced at three minting facilities: Huguenin Frères & Cie (Le Locle, Switzerland): 1922, 1923 Birmingham Mint (Heaton & Sons, Great Britain): 1926, 1928 Royal Mint (London, Great Britain): 1932 Coins minted by Huguenin Frères carry the mint name below the ribbon on the obverse. Coins minted in Great Britain do not carry a mint name. ‘Variants’ with or without mint or designer name Weebly.com It is often assumed, on the basis of information from the Standard Catalog of World Coins, that there are two variants of the 2 santimi 1922. Over time, the description of this ‘variation’ changed from with or without designer’s name to with or without mint name: The reason for the acknowledgement of alleged variants of the 2 santimi (and equally of the 1 santims and 5 santimi), is that by design, the lettering of the mint and designer name is very delicate and even hard to read by the naked eye. Some coins seem to be missing one or the other, or both, but do show (weak) traces of them on a closer look. Because of the small and subtle nature of the lettering, apparent absence of the mint or designer name has to be attributed to die wear and die filling at the mint or post mint circulation wear and corrosion. Positive attribution of a missing mint or designer name is possible only for high grade examples, having the coin at hand (rather than from an image). Apart from the fact that the coins struck by Huguenin Frères (1922-1923) feature the mint name, and the coins struck in Great Britain (1926-1932) do not, there is no ground to assume structural variation within any of the years of the 2 santimi. The 1923 Patterns The Latvian government was not satisfied with the quality of the dies of the 1922 strike. In response, Huguenin Frères prepared new dies for the 1923 strike, with an improved, more pronounced relief. Sample coins were sent to the Latvian government, but ultimately, no more 2 santimi coins were ordered from Huguenin. According to official contemporary documents, the pattern coins had a weight of 2.5 g. In the 1990-ies, all 1923 pattern coins preserved in the Latvian National Archive were stolen and offered for sale to a coin dealer. The mintage reported in SCWC is actually the number of patterns acquired by this dealer. More copies may still be at large. In addition, Huguenin Frères has an unknown number of these pattern coins in their archive. The mintage of 2 is the lowest estimate, the exact number is unknown. Of the coins dated 1926, 900,000 were minted in 1925 and 4,100,000 were minted in 1926. Of the coins dated 1932, 250,000 were minted in 1931 and 4,750,000 were minted in 1932

See also